Need Help? Give us a call.
1 (800) 386-3372
The costs of launching a business can be steep for any entrepreneur—especially if you’re looking to hire additional help. Businesses that hire traditional W2 employees to fill this need will also need to take into account extra costs that can impact their business development plans. They’ll often have to factor in health and benefits plans, FICA and withholding taxes, training, and more.
For those looking to avoid these types of hassles, working with 1099 workers vs. W2 employees can be a good strategy. But choosing independent contractors and freelancers can come with some important legal considerations—many of which run contrary to commonly held beliefs about the employer-independent contractor relationship.
If you hire or work with independent contractors—or even think about it—you’ll need to know these five important liability factors. Some of them really might surprise you. We’ll go through them using the FAQ of you, the small business owner.
Things have changed, and you don’t need to work with independent contractors solely through email and video calls. But if your contractors are okay with working onsite at your offices, this doesn’t mean you should treat them like your W2 employees.
Microsoft made this mistake several decades ago when it hired temporary workers and made them sign agreements stating they were “independent contractors” and, in turn, not entitled to employee benefits. Nonetheless, Microsoft required these non-employee workers to work at its offices alongside employee team members and with their company supervisors. It also supplied contractors with their office supplies, company equipment, and even building entrance keys.
Upon learning about Microsoft’s practices, the IRS demanded Microsoft to treat these contractors as employees for payroll tax and tax withholding purposes. But Microsoft ended up being liable for more.
After several of the company’s freelancers discovered what was going on, they filed a successful class-action lawsuit to receive employee benefits that was upheld in the 9th Circuit a year later.
So, although working with contractors in person might be necessary depending on your business’s needs, you should work with your attorney or in-house counsel to ensure the way your company treats these contractors is distinct and different from the way your company treats employees.
Generally, businesses aren’t liable for any actions, omissions, or injuries resulting from an independent contractor’s activities. That said, there are exceptions to this. (Aren’t there always?)
Independent contractors aren’t subject to the same workers’ compensation claim limitations that employees are. So, these freelancer workers could directly sue you or your business for damages beyond medical and disability expenses for any workplace injuries stemming from your business’s negligence. Independent contractors can also have the ability to file workers’ comp claims if they’ve been misclassified by the employer as independent contractors and really should’ve been considered employees.
Plus, some states have developed case-law-informed exceptions to the general rule that employers aren’t liable to independent contractors for injuries they sustain while working on projects:
If you don’t feel 100% comfortable, you might do well contacting an experienced employment attorney to learn more about various federal and state regulations that could impact your specific industry and business. Especially before you start working with lots of independent workers.
Employers are also not generally liable for any injuries or damage an independent contractor causes to customers and other third parties. That’s good news. But, as you might expect, there are several scenarios worth noting where the opposite would be true.
Some states will allow third parties to sue the employer for any injuries that a freelancer causes from an inherently dangerous activity. Even if the contractors are skilled, or use reasonable care to carry out their jobs, they could still be at fault if the danger is deemed “foreseeable.”
Some states have their own standards that companies will have to consider if they conduct business there. California’s Doctrine of Peculiar Risk, for example, makes employers liable in situations in which the employer was aware of a special risk of harm to others. And also in which the independent contractor failed to use reasonable care to follow appropriate safety measures to avoid the risk.
Plus, states including New York and California recognize that businesses can be liable for independent contractors as a result of negligent hiring or by passing on duties that can’t be delegated away under contract. These facts underscore the idea that all businesses should be performing their due diligence on the contractors they decide to work with. You’ll need to make sure you take all appropriate steps to mitigate potential harms resulting from the contractor’s work.
Unless the parties agree to otherwise in a contract, independent contractors are generally free to take on work from other clients in addition to the work you provide them. Naturally, this can include work from potential competitors within the same industry as yours.
But any agreements or NDAs you enter into with your contractors can’t be unduly restrictive or impose too much control over the contractor’s ability to work on other projects or ventures within the same industry as yours. This issue came up recently in Ag Spectrum Co. v. Elder, an 8th Circuit case that involved an overly burdensome non-compete agreement.
Here, a fertilizer company and a fertilizer salesman entered into an agreement that featured a three-year non-compete clause. Over the course of their working relationship, the salesman found the majority of his own customers, paid for his materials, and otherwise operated independently from the fertilizer company. After the company terminated its relationship with him, the salesman tried starting his own company and the fertilizer company sued him for breaching their employment agreement. At trial, however, the contract was deemed too onerous and one-sided to be enforceable on the salesman.
Although this doesn’t mean that companies should avoid using contracts entirely, any NDAs or contractor agreements must be reasonably tailored to the terms of the project and not be overly burdensome on the contractor you’re engaging.
We’ve covered most of the distinctions between W2 employees and 1099 independent contractors before. But one more interesting distinction that the IRS factors in when determining whether you’ve misclassified an independent contractor is how much financial control you have over the freelancer’s work.
Many of the factors the IRS analyzes in determining whether you’ve misclassified an employee addresses whether you’ve reimbursed expenses or supplied the contractor with materials—both of which alone would suggest you’re working with an employee. But they also look at how you’re determining rates with your contractors:
You can review the complete list of IRS financial factors and see how they play in to the IRS’s overall analysis of distinguishing employees from independent contractors. It would also be good to also review the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)’s Economic Reality Test—which you might encounter during independent contractor-related employment litigation—as a way to see how courts may analyze your policies and working relationships with independent contractors.
Whether or not you decide to work with freelance contractors ultimately rests with you and your business’s needs. In the end, it can be an immense cost-saving and productivity generating move for your business’s future and growth.
Disclaimer: This article has been prepared for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem.